The Terrific Three, so yeah, in a matter of day's round 2 will be over, brining up a point I had never thought to consider. We definitely would be able to have a round 3, and we will. Here's how it will work;
Everyone will be sent an email with everyone's info attached. You may go after anyone, anyone may go after you. If you get hit, you are not out of the game. I think that bears repeating, if you are hit, you are NOT out of the game. How does one win? I have decided specifically yet, but we will probably have 3 categories for winners.
1. The person who got the most kills. (The assassin Award)
2. The person who got hit the least. (The stealthily Award)
3. The person who got the highest combination of these scores, +1 for a kill, -1 for a hit. (The Overall Award)
The game will run until graduation, or until one person gets everyone playing.
Once you make a kill, that person cannot kill you back until midnight. Of course you cannot get points for getting the same person twice, but if you get them again, then they cannot get you until midnight.
All other rules apply.
Why? It solves a lot of problems the game has had these two rounds. It is impossible to keep secret who has who. If everyone has everyone, this becomes a non-issue. It gives more people opportunity at the win. Secrecy becomes an individual affair, and much easier to manage.
Also it creates some interesting scenarios. Picture, if you will, what would happen if two proposed assassins arrived at the same house at the same time. Instant showdown.
So yeah, I really think that's the best way to do it, at least once, before school's out and I leave forever. At that time I will probably pass the liquidation torch on to someone I believe will keep it going for as long as possible.
Yeah so now what you've all been waiting for:
Liquidated:
5/9/06
-Jordan Brown liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
-Jonny Steinberg liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
-Helen Kehoe liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
5/10/06
-Devin Monaghan liquidated by Farbodd Ganjifard
-Lisa Carrigg liquidated by Kayley Dorsa
5/11/06
-Sam Anderson liquidated by Scott Archer
-James Grey liquidated by Kayley Dorsa
-Alex Madden liquidated by Ian Kenny
5/12/06
-Farbodd Ganjifard liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
-Jessica Kremer liquidated by Kayley Dorsa
5/13/06
-Ian Kenny liquidated by Alex Fulton
-Maksim Dobrioglo liquidated by Scott Archer
5/14/06
-Bryan Evans liquidated by Jacob Thomas-Low
-Charlie Olson liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
-Alex Melcher TIME VIOLATION
-Laurie Fullmer TIME VIOLATION
-Sean Friar TIME VIOLATION
-Spencer Raymond TIME VIOLATION
5/15/06
-Jacob Thomas-Low liquidated by Alex Fulton
5/16/06
-Alex Fulton liquidated by Kaitlyn Barclay
Active:
-Kaitlyn Barclay
-Kayley Dorsa
-Scott Archer
posted by Searcher @ 10:10 PM
8 Comments:
TERRIBLE IDEA why not do teams of 2?
Why not have two games going at once?
A regular and a get everyone?
I think that would be an excellent dynamic, and then there is still the aspect of strategic winnerness competition.
we meed to do something about parents geting pissed off. It ruins it if parents start getting mad and making kids leave.
If you parent isn't gonna play along then don't use that to your advantage.
Parents must learn to let us play, otherwise this game is dumb.
NO! We need teams and two different sets, from what I've observed 90% of the lakeridge kids do absolutely nothing, I dont want to sound like a dick but I think it would be best to keep this one all LO. and I think this game will take forever and be a bitch to keep track of.
Many points have been raised, I will attempt to address each of them:
1. Teams of 2
While I would like to entertain this idea, I believe it would take too long. Many people are leaving at the beginning of summer so I want the game go have a time limit on graduation. I believe that teams of 2 should take place at a more oppertune time when people aren't leaving for summer jobs, vacations, etc.
2. Two games at once
That's just too fucking confusing, one ref couldn't handle that. If you want to start your own game, go for it, but I would like to make the friendly suguetion that you wait till summer to do so.
3. Parents
Good luck controling parents. If a parent gets pissed off they have every right to. I mean a lot of the time the game is taking place on their property and if you think about it they're being fairly considerate letting it go as far as it has.
4. Ban Lakeridge kids
While I agree it has been frustrating communicating with them at times, I believe it is important to keep expanding their numbers in the game. Soon enough we will tap into the kind of people there that really like this kind of thing and it will be more fun for everyone. Also, that would be quite unfair to the Lakeridge kids who do participate fully.
I hate to be the dictator, but I really think you would enjoy the game I have set up. Its less stressful in some ways, and it is an interesting twist. While I would like to do teams, at this point in the year it would be hard to limit that to June 9th, and for that reason I think we should avoid it.
hmmmmmm. i like the target idea better. I think with the new rules there is much less motivation.
claire speaks the truth
sure...
except for the fact that anyone could have you at any given moment and you have to watch out for way more people
if you like paranoia, this game would increase it 25 fold (or however many people end up playing round 3)
Post a Comment
<< Home